Images

Our Firm Secures Time Served Sentence for Restaurant Owner Falsely Charged with Labor Trafficking and Alien Smuggling

Estela Gonzalez (middle) with Paraletal Emily Brooks and Attorney Tom Church

Estela Gonzalez (middle) with Paralegal Emily Brooks and Attorney Tom Church

For the past year and a half, our firm has been part of a joint defense team representing Efrain and Estela Gonzalez, the husband-and-wife owners of a popular Mexican restaurant, Sabor a Mexico, who were falsely accused of labor trafficking, alien smuggling, and other offenses under federal law. The Government initially charged the Gonzalezes in a 16-count indictment alleging that they brought in illegal immigrants from Mexico, made them work under brutal conditions and for no pay, threatened them with deportation and harm to their family, and sexually assaulted and harassed some of their employees. 

From the beginning, the Gonzalezes adamantly maintained their innocence of these charges. In fact, Efrain and Estela had become aware of the government’s investigation well before their arrest, as there had been rumors that a group of disgruntled former workers from Sabor, most of them illegally here in the U.S., were making false allegations against the Gonzalezes in order to gain legal immigration status that the federal government grants to illegal immigrants who are victims of crimes.

In fact, the rumors were true. Our firm was retained by the Gonzalezes prior to their arrest, and we conducted a vigorous defense investigation that exposed the scheme against them. We interviewed dozens of witnesses, obtained hundreds of pages of financial records, reviewed thousands of text messages, Facebook messages, and found pictures and videos from the social media accounts of the alleged victims. This evidence showed that the alleged victims had been well paid, enjoyed a positive environment at work, and had the opportunity to live the American dream while at Sabor, as evidenced by their vibrant social lives outside of work.

We also filed a motion to depose favorable defense witnesses who knew the alleged victims (and that the alleged victims were lying) but were scheduled to leave the U.S. once their visas departed. That motion was granted, and we had the unusual opportunity to depose witnesses in a criminal case.

Fortunately, we were able to conduct a thorough investigation in this case despite the fact that both of the Gonzalezes were denied bond, something that makes defense investigations much harder. Their pretrial incarceration also gave the Government leverage–a client out on bond is more likely to elect to go to trial, while an incarcerated client may be more willing to cut a deal if it gets them out of jail sooner.

That’s what happened in this case. Last week, we helped secure Estela’s release from federal custody pursuant to a plea deal with the government that required the government to dismiss all of the original charges and allow Estela to receive a time served sentence after she pleaded guilty to hiring illegal immigrants at her restaurant. By all accounts, this was a major win, as it is any time a client or a client’s loved one is released from custody. This outcome was especially notable since the government had flown down a specialized lawyer from the Department of Justice’s Human Trafficking Unit in Washington, D.C. specifically for this case.

To be clear, however, this was not a case where we got a “sweetheart” deal for our client based on some technicality. Rather, we forced the government to abandon its initial case by conducting a defense investigation that blew up the government’s case.

The evidence the defense obtained was credible, uncontroverted, and painted a much different picture than the government’s allegations–our investigation exposed the group of disgruntled former employees who were deliberately making false allegations of labor trafficking and exploitation against the Gonzalezes. Due to a shoddy investigation by the government’s agents and the absence of any due diligence, these alleged victims succeeded in fooling the government and obtaining legal immigration status normally reserved for actual victims of crimes. They then used the promise of legal status to recruit others to join in their false allegations against the Gonzalezes.

Confronted by this evidence, and knowing that they would not be able to win their original case at trial, the prosecutors in this case agreed to allow Estela to plead guilty to a much more minor offense–hiring illegal immigrants rather than exploiting them–and be released from custody. She is now back home with her family, where she belongs. Efrain has also accepted a deal to plead to the lesser charge and will be sentenced likely later this year.

The case was covered extensively by the media, which initially parroted the government’s false claims about the Gonzalezes. Fortunately for the Gonzalezes, our firm was able to respond forcefully to the false allegations through interviews with outlets like Univision, which granted Attorney Tom Church an exclusive interview to discuss the case. Of course, much work remains to clear the Gonzalezes’ names, and the next step is to bring Efrain home as soon as possible.

If you or a loved one has been charged with labor trafficking, alien smuggling, or other similar federal offenses, call our firm to speak to one of our experienced, compassionate attorneys. We are ready to fight for you and your family.

Continue reading

DEA Proposes Downgrading Marijuana to Schedule III; GA Governor Signs New Hemp Regulations

Cannabis leaves

April 30, 2024, was a landmark day for the cannabis industry and cannabis consumers in Georgia and throughout the rest of the country, as government officials announced major changes to the federal and state laws that govern cannabis, including marijuana and hemp.

At the federal level, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced its proposal to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule III controlled substance. As it currently stands, marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law, just like heroin and methamphetamine, meaning the federal government does not recognize any medicinal applications. Federal criminal laws also carry harsh penalties for possession and distribution of Schedule I substances, including long mandatory minimum prison sentences.

As a Schedule III controlled substance, marijuana will be treated like Tylenol with codeine and other prescription medication. That might resolve a dispute between the DEA and Georgia pharmacies that wish to sell medical THC oil. Reclassification to Schedule III will also increase research into the medicinal benefits of marijuana. And finally, marijuana companies will have an easier time accessing banking services.

Critically, possessing and distributing marijuana will still be a federal crime even if marijuana is reclassified to Schedule III. Rather than facing a mandatory minimum of ten years in prison, however, ten years would be the maximum. As such, we will likely see far fewer federal prosecutions for marijuana offenses, which have already been declining for several years now as the DEA has targeted other drugs. 

Marijuana will also remain illegal in the states where it is currently illegal, though little is expected to change in states that have legalized recreational or medical marijuana. While the DEA’s new proposal is not quite a revolution, it is a substantial reform, though it is unclear at this time whether President Biden will follow up with additional pardons and sentence commutations for people convicted of marijuana offenses.

On the same day, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp signed SB 494, a bill creating a regulatory framework for the purchase and sale of consumable hemp products like Delta-8, Delta-10, and other hemp-derived cannabinoids. The legislation is significant as it creates rules and regulations for a market of cannabis products in Georgia that are psychoactive. Essentially, it is legal to get “high” in Georgia with these products, even as marijuana remains illegal in the state. Our firm has covered the biggest changes coming in SB 494.

If your or a loved one has been charged with felony offenses relating to the distribution or sale of marijuana or hemp products, contact our firm. We’re ready to fight for you.

Continue reading

Cannabis gummies spilling on counter

Court of Appeals Rules that Delta-8-THC and Other Hemp Extracts Are Legal, Orders the District Attorney to Return Our Client’s Seized Property

Last Thursday, the Court of Appeals became the first appellate court in Georgia to consider whether Delta-8-THC and other similar products are legal hemp extracts or illegal controlled substances under state law—and our clients won.

Our clients are a distribution company that supplies convenience stores, gas stations, and vape stores with tobacco, nicotine vapes, and hemp products that contain CBD, CBO, Delta-8-THC, Delta-10-THC, and other hemp extracts. Hemp is a form of cannabis that lacks significant quantities of Delta-9-THC, the kind of THC that gets users “high.” Hemp and hemp extracts were legalized in 2019 under the Georgia Hemp Farming Act, which legalizes all cannabis and cannabis extracts as long as they contain “less than 0.3% Delta-9-THC.

This case began in early 2022, when the District Attorney’s Office and Gwinnett County Metro Task Force raised our client’s warehouse, seizing their entire hemp inventory, their business records, and almost $300,000 in cash. Even though Attorney Tom Church had previously obtained an injunction against the District Attorney prohibiting her from conducting further raids and arrests, they refused to return our clients property. Litigation ensued, and we ended up taking the case to the Court of Appeals.

We argued that Delta-8-THC and other hemp extracts are not controlled substances because hemp and hemp products are excluded from the definitions of “marijuana” and “THC” under Georgia’s criminal code. After we presented expert evidence regarding the differences between hemp and marijuana in our injunction case, the State had to concede that, in their pure form, hemp extracts are not illegal. The State maintained that they become illegal, however, if found in food products. 

The Court of Appeals rejected the State’s argument, holding that it “has no merit.” The Court found that the “plain language” of Georgia’s criminal laws prohibiting marijuana and THC makes exceptions for any cannabinoids extracted from hemp, as long as they contain less than 0.3% Delta-9-THC.

While the judges didn’t all agree on the reasons, they all agreed our clients were entitled to all of their property back, and that the State did not have the right to seize their property or retain custody of it. Critically, the majority opinion explicitly recognized the legality of Delta-8-THC, Delta-10-THC, and other similar products, regardless of whether they are contained in edible or non-edible products.

There has been extensive media coverage of the case, and Attorney Tom Church has broken down the Court’s opinion for media outlets in the metro Atlanta area, including interviews with Fox5, Atlanta News First, 11Alive, and Georgia Public Broadcasting. His analysis of the case has been featured in legal publications like the Daily Report and Law360. The Court has published its opinion online and has archived the oral arguments in the case on their website.

Because the judges did not unanimously agree on the details, and because their opinion was based in part on the fact that the District Attorney conceded that some hemp-derived THC products are legal, there is still a possibility that other prosecutors, sheriffs, and other officials may continue misinterpreting the law. In fact, our firm was recently retained by another business that has been raided based on its sale of hemp extracts..

So, while this opinion was undoubtedly a win for the hemp industry, retailers, distributors, and manufacturers of hemp products should continue staying up-to-date on the law and ensuring they have testing and chain-of-custody  policies in place to comply with the law. 

If you or a loved one has been contacted by law enforcement due to the sale or possession of Delta-8-THC or other hemp products, call our firm. Our firm has successfully fought on behalf of small businesses and consumers across Georgia, and we are ready to fight for you.

Continue reading

Attorney Tom Church

Daily Report Covers Our Firm’s $500,000 Settlement for Client Falsely Charged with Possessing Child Porn

Our firm has written about our successful efforts to get our client’s false child porn charges dropped and our subsequent efforts to seek compensation from the City and police department that charged our client. 

The Daily Report, a law publication that covers significant cases in Georgia, covered our firm’s efforts in an article published today. The article was written by Cedra Mayfield. 

See below for the full text of the article.

Attorney Tom Church

“…A metro-Atlanta attorney has secured a six-figure settlement for a small-town client falsely arrested and charged with possessing child pornography in connection to screenshots stored within and reported by a cloud-based image and video-hosting service.

Thomas D. Church of the Church Law Firm in Roswell credits the $500,000 settlement with the city of Thomasville to his ability to convey his client’s claims of malicious prosecution through a position paper backed by clear-cut evidence.

“I knew we needed to show, not just that Mr. Clements was innocent and that the police had made a mistake, but that the police in this case acted egregiously,” Church told the Daily Report.

‘Not Interested in the Truth’

It’s been four years since Thomasville police officers executed a search warrant at the Thomas County home of Neil Clements based on an automated tip generated by Flickr, a cloud-based storage service, according to Church.

Plaintiffs counsel said his client’s Flickr account ”incorrectly flagged images in [Clements’] cloud storage account as ‘potential’ or ‘suspected’ child pornography.”

“Flickr and other social media and cloud-based storage services sometimes use algorithms that are designed to try to identify sexually explicit pictures of minors. The problem here, of course, is that the pictures were of adults engaged in consensual sex,” Church said. “As in most of these kinds of cases, Flickr automatically forwarded the tip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Critically, NCMEC had never seen these images before, let alone identified them as child pornography, so they forwarded the tip to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation for further investigation.”

Church said the GBI responded to the tip by dispatching Thomasville police officers to Clements’ home, but called law enforcement’s subsequent actions “an egregious failure” that amounted to the “malicious prosecution” of his client.

“When investigators showed up at our client’s house with a search warrant to seize his computer and cellphone, they interviewed him. During that interview, our client insisted that the images were screenshots from a PornHub video featuring consenting adults, not children,” Church said. 

“Unfortunately, the officers were not interested in the truth and had already made up their minds that our client was guilty, so rather than do any further investigation, they ignored our client’s claims and arrested him for child porn possession. If convicted, our client faced decades in prison, and life as a registered sex offender.”

But it’s what Church did next that not only spared his client jail time, but resulted in all charges being dropped and a six-figure settlement being reached. J. Travis Hall of Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz & Griggs in Macon represented the city of Thomasville but had not responded to a request for comment as of midday Tuesday.

‘Viewed 12 Million Times’

To clear his client’s name, Church said he reached out to former Thomas County Assistant District Attorney Catherine Smith to provide evidence that his client had not been in possession of child pornography.

In addition to sending Smith a link to the online video from which the screenshots had been taken, Church said he went one step further to include an email correspondence he’d had with the women featured in the footage that confirmed they’d not been minors.

“We emphasized that these pictures came from a video on a well-known website, PornHub, that featured consenting adults who had been verified as adults by the website, and that the video had been viewed 12 million times,” Church said.

Plaintiffs counsel said the evidence led the Thomas County District Attorney’s Office to dismiss its case against Clements in February 2022.

In addition to getting the charges dropped, Church prevailed at getting Clements’ record sealed, but said the damage to his client’s reputation had already been done.

“The newspaper, which had run a story about his charges, only provided an update in the old article noting that his case had been dismissed—not that there was proof he was actually innocent,” Church said. “Our client could not get his old job back, and the rumors in town continued.”

‘Our Client Heard an Apology’

With his client “financially ruined” by the false arrest, Church said he demanded additional justice for Clements in the form of damages from the city of Thomasville.

As the investigating officers’ employer, plaintiffs counsel contended in a position letter that local law enforcement “had ruined the life of an innocent man based on their deliberate disregard of the truth and their failure to adequately investigate their case.”

While honoring the city’s subsequent request for mediation, Church said he outlined why he believed plaintiffs counsel would win should the case be tried before a jury.

In addition to the evidence presented to get his client’s charges dropped, Church honed in on the officers’ “complete failure to investigate whether the images were actually child pornography before prosecuting [Clements].”

“The City of Thomasville did the right thing and was willing to offer our client a significant settlement,” Church said. “The city committed to paying our client $500,000 to settle his claims against the city and its police department. Just as importantly, the attorney representing the city’s insurer apologized to our client for what he had been through—the first time our client heard an apology for his false arrest and prosecution.”

Church said he and his client are now considering whether to pursue claims against the GBI for what plaintiffs counsel considered additional egregious conduct by an agent involved in the case, but noted “it is notoriously difficult to sue the GBI.”

If you or a loved one has been charged with a federal or state crime and need an experienced trial attorney who you can trust to fight for you, contact our firm. We will be honest with you and work hard for you.

Continue reading

Thomasville Superior Courthouse

Our Firm Obtains $500,000 Settlement for Client Falsely Charged With Possession of Child Pornography

Superior Court of Thomas County in Thomasville, Georgia

This week, our firm obtained a second major victory for a client who was falsely charged with possessing child pornography. After we obtained a dismissal of his charges last year, the City of Thomasville last week agreed to pay our client $500,000 to settle his claims for wrongful prosecution against the City and its police department. Our client was arrested and charged with child porn offenses based on his possession of screenshots from a PornHub video that featured adults, came from a verified account, and had been viewed over 12 million times.

How an innocent person can be charged with child pornography offenses

The case began in March 2019, when Flickr, a cloud-based storage service like DropBox, incorrectly flagged images in our client’s cloud storage account as “potential” or “suspected” child pornography. Flickr and other social media and cloud-based storage services sometimes use algorithms that are designed to try to identify sexually explicit pictures of minors. The problem here, of course, is that the pictures were of adults engaged in consensual sex.

As in most of these kinds of cases, Flickr automatically forwarded the tip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Critically, NCMEC had never seen these images before, let alone identified them as child pornography, so they forwarded the tip to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation for further investigation. The GBI then worked with the Thomasville Police Department since our client lived in Thomasville.

What happened next was an egregious failure by law enforcement in this case. When investigators showed up at our client’s house with a search warrant to seize his computer and cell phone, they interviewed him. During that interview, our client insisted that the images were screenshots from a PornHub video featuring consenting adults, not children.

Unfortunately, the officers were not interested in the truth and had already made up their minds that our client was guilty, so rather than do any further investigation, they ignored our client’s claims and arrested him for child porn possession. If convicted, our client faced decades in prison and life as a registered sex offender.

How we obtained justice for our client–twice

Our client was an upstanding member of his community, and he lost almost everything overnight. His reputation was destroyed, his family estranged, and he was financially ruined. Fortunately, he hired our law firm, and the District Attorney did the right thing and dismissed the case when we sent them proof through the link to the PornHub video. We also contacted the women from the video, who confirmed they were not minors.

While our client’s criminal case was behind him, and his record was sealed, the damage was done. The newspaper which had run a story about his charges only provided an update in the old article noting that his case had been dismissed—not that there was proof he was actually innocent. Our client could not get his old job back, and the rumors in town continued. 

Still seeking justice, we promptly sent the City of Thomasville a demand letter for damages, explaining how their police department had ruined the life of an innocent man based on their deliberate disregard of the truth and their failure to adequately investigate their case. The City requested mediation, where the parties get together to negotiate a settlement. We presented a detailed case that explained why we felt we would win a jury trial. 

Like the District Attorney, the City of Thomasville did the right thing and was willing to offer our client a significant settlement. Last week, the City committed to paying our client $500,000 to settle his claims against the City and its police department. Just as importantly, the attorney representing the City’s insurer apologized to our client for what he had been through—the first time our client heard an apology for his false arrest and prosecution.

While money alone won’t restore our client’s standing in the community or make up for the pain and suffering he experienced after being falsely accused of such a serious crime, it’s a start. And while our fight to restore our client’s name and reputation continues, the fact that the City agreed to a significant settlement of his claims reflects the fact that he was truly innocent.

Contact us if you or a loved one has been falsely charged with child pornography offenses or any other serious crime

If you or a loved one have been falsely charged with a serious crime, please contact our firm. Not every criminal case will lead to a lawsuit, even if the charges are dismissed, but the first and most important thing you need is someone to fight hard to prove your innocence. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you and your family.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Awards


Top 40 Under 40
Best Lawyers
Thomas Church
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...